The statement about poor people's unity is true?

The statement about poor people's unity is true?

• A. True
• B. False
• C. Not stated
• D. Sometimes

Answer: (B)

The situation the novel portrays is complex: there are moments of help and shared hardship among the poor, but lasting unity is not presented as universal or dependable. Steinbeck shows people banding together—sharing meals, information, and support when they can—but he also reveals constant strains: scarce jobs, competition for resources, mistrust, and the way powerful landowners and authorities pit people against each other. This mix means unity among the poor is fragile and situational, not a true, broad-consensus condition for all affected communities. That’s why the statement isn’t supported by the text.

The situation the novel portrays is complex: there are moments of help and shared hardship among the poor, but lasting unity is not presented as universal or dependable. Steinbeck shows people banding together—sharing meals, information, and support when they can—but he also reveals constant strains: scarce jobs, competition for resources, mistrust, and the way powerful landowners and authorities pit people against each other. This mix means unity among the poor is fragile and situational, not a true, broad-consensus condition for all affected communities. That’s why the statement isn’t supported by the text.