Does Connie think he and Rose of Sharon should have stayed in Oklahoma?

Does Connie think he and Rose of Sharon should have stayed in Oklahoma?

• A. Yes
• B. No
• C. Maybe
• D. Not sure

Answer: (A)

Understanding a character’s stance on staying versus leaving is key here. Connie is portrayed as someone who values the security and familiarity of home and land. When the idea of moving from Oklahoma comes up, he expresses that staying would have been better, emphasizing the desire to keep their family tied to the land and its livelihood. This clear preference for remaining on the familiar ground shows he thinks they should have stayed. The other responses imply uncertainty or a contrary wish to leave, which isn’t supported by how the character is depicted in the text.

Understanding a character’s stance on staying versus leaving is key here. Connie is portrayed as someone who values the security and familiarity of home and land. When the idea of moving from Oklahoma comes up, he expresses that staying would have been better, emphasizing the desire to keep their family tied to the land and its livelihood. This clear preference for remaining on the familiar ground shows he thinks they should have stayed. The other responses imply uncertainty or a contrary wish to leave, which isn’t supported by how the character is depicted in the text.